W*P*P*C
« Re: Wake up Y'all!!! »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jan 19th, 2018, 12:45pm



Shoutbox

« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8  Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Re: Wake up Y'all!!!  (Read 23191 times)
SpiffCat
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 2210
xx Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #75 on: Jul 24th, 2009, 03:51am »

on Jul 23rd, 2009, 10:17pm, Jackolope wrote:
^watches videos


This just in...

Getting cable? Better not having anti government bumper stickers on your car... You'll get reported to home land security...

and here is the source

JEEZE!


I do not like the tone of your voice, citizen. I shall have to report this violation. I am merely performing my patriotic duty. It has nothing to do with the fact that it is the only way for me to convert my California I.O.U.'s into food and housing credits. A cable guy will be coming along shortly to detain you for questioning. Remember: Waterboarding is not torture. It is just a new recreational sport.

-- Fahrenheit451Cat
« Last Edit: Jul 24th, 2009, 03:52am by SpiffCat » User IP Logged

User Image
SpiffCat
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 2210
xx Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #76 on: Jul 25th, 2009, 04:07am »

on Jul 24th, 2009, 03:51am, SpiffCat wrote:
I do not like the tone of your voice, citizen. I shall have to report this violation. I am merely performing my patriotic duty. It has nothing to do with the fact that it is the only way for me to convert my California I.O.U.'s into food and housing credits. A cable guy will be coming along shortly to detain you for questioning. Remember: Waterboarding is not torture. It is just a new recreational sport.

-- Fahrenheit451Cat


Dang... I spooked everyone into not posting...

-- LonesomeWithoutThePoleCat
User IP Logged

User Image
SpiffCat
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 2210
exclamation Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #77 on: Aug 12th, 2009, 5:06pm »

Look out, Yard! The govt is looking for wake up calls!

Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S.

WASHINGTON – Militia groups with gripes against the government are regrouping across the country and could grow rapidly, according to an organization that tracks such trends.

The stress of a poor economy and a liberal administration led by a black president are among the causes for the recent rise, the report from the Southern Poverty Law Center says. Conspiracy theories about a secret Mexican plan to reclaim the Southwest are also growing amid the public debate about illegal immigration.

Bart McEntire, a special agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, told SPLC researchers that this is the most growth he's seen in more than a decade.

"All it's lacking is a spark," McEntire said in the report.

It's reminiscent of what was seen in the 1990s — right-wing militias, people ideologically against paying taxes and so-called "sovereign citizens" are popping up in large numbers, according to the report to be released Wednesday. The SPLC is a nonprofit civil rights group that, among other activities, investigates hate groups.

Last October, someone from the Ohio Militia posted a recruiting video on YouTube, billed as a "wake-up call" for America. It's been viewed more than 60,000 times.

"Things are bad, things are real bad, and it's going to be a lot worse," said the man on the video, who did not give his name. "Our country is in peril."

The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one.

While anti-government sentiment has been on the rise over the last two years, there aren't as many threats and violent acts at this point as there were in the 1990s, according to the report. That movement bore the likes of Timothy McVeigh, who in 1995 blew up a federal building in Oklahoma City and killed 168 people.

But McEntire fears it's only a matter of time.

These militias are concentrated in the Midwest, Pacific Northwest and the Deep South, according to Mark Potok, an SPLC staff director who co-wrote the report. Recruiting videos and other outreach on the Internet are on the rise, he said, and researchers from his center found at least 50 new groups in the last few months.

The militia movement of the 1990s gained traction with growing concerns about gun control, environmental laws and anything perceived as liberal government meddling.

The spark for that movement came in 1992 with an FBI standoff with white separatist Randall Weaver at Ruby Ridge, Idaho. Weaver's wife and son were killed by an FBI sniper. And in 1993, a 52-day standoff between federal agents and the Branch Davidian cult in Waco, Texas, resulted in nearly 80 deaths. These events rallied more people who became convinced that the government would murder its own citizens to promote its liberal agenda.

Now officials are seeing a new generation of activists, according to the report. The law center spotlights Edward Koernke, a Michigan man who hosts an Internet radio show about militias. His father, Mark, was a major figure in the 1990s militia movement and served six years in prison for charges including assaulting police.

Last year, officials warned about an increase in activity from militias in a five-year threat projection by the Homeland Security Department.

"White supremacists and militias are more violent and thus more likely to conduct mass-casualty attacks on the scale of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing," the threat projection said.

A series of domestic terrorism incidents over the past year have not been directly tied to organized militias, but the rhetoric behind some of the crimes are similar with that of the militia movement. For instance, the man charged with the April killings of three Pittsburgh police officers posted some of his views online. Richard Andrew Poplawski wrote that U.S. troops could be used against American citizens, and he thinks a gun ban could be coming.

The FBI's assistant director for counterterrorism, Michael Heimbach, said that law enforcement officials need to identify people who go beyond hateful rhetoric and decide to commit violent acts and crimes. Heimbach said one of the bigger challenges is identifying the lone-wolf offenders.

One alleged example of a lone-wolf offender is the 88-year-old man charged in the June shooting death of a guard at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington.

-- WeAreGoingToNeedRealMechsCat
User IP Logged

User Image
Jackolope
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mayans off a year?

YIM YIM AIM
Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4129
exclamation Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #78 on: Aug 18th, 2009, 10:58pm »

Get a load of this one..

2,000 Guns Confiscated Under Conn. Seizure Law

Quote:
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) ― Police in Connecticut say they've now seized more than 2,000 firearms under a 1999 law that allows authorities to confiscate guns from people they suspect might harm themselves or others.

A report prepared for the state legislature says state and local police seized 2,093 guns from October 1999 to May 2009.

Seymour police used the law last year to take three guns away from a local man after his co-workers reported that he threatened to blow up his workplace. Police searched his computer and discovered he visited Web sites dealing with murders, violence and workplace shootings.

*What, fox news?

The gun seizure law was passed a year after a disgruntled Connecticut Lottery worker shot four top lottery officials and himself to death at the agency
User IP Logged

SpiffCat
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 2210
exclamation Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #79 on: Aug 19th, 2009, 01:10am »

on Aug 18th, 2009, 10:58pm, Jackolope wrote:
Get a load of this one..

2,000 Guns Confiscated Under Conn. Seizure Law



Life is becoming a movie.

-- MinorityReportCat
User IP Logged

User Image
Jackolope
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mayans off a year?

YIM YIM AIM
Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4129
exclamation Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #80 on: Aug 28th, 2009, 11:07pm »

HERE WE GO AGAIN! Rockefeller Redux

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html


Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

Quote:
Internet companies and civil liberties groups were alarmed this spring when a U.S. Senate bill proposed handing the White House the power to disconnect private-sector computers from the Internet.

They're not much happier about a revised version that aides to Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.

The new version would allow the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for "cybersecurity professionals," and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.

"I think the redraft, while improved, remains troubling due to its vagueness," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which counts representatives of Verizon, Verisign, Nortel, and Carnegie Mellon University on its board. "It is unclear what authority Sen. Rockefeller thinks is necessary over the private sector. Unless this is clarified, we cannot properly analyze, let alone support the bill."

Representatives of other large Internet and telecommunications companies expressed concerns about the bill in a teleconference with Rockefeller's aides this week, but were not immediately available for interviews on Thursday.

A spokesman for Rockefeller also declined to comment on the record Thursday, saying that many people were unavailable because of the summer recess. A Senate source familiar with the bill compared the president's power to take control of portions of the Internet to what President Bush did when grounding all aircraft on Sept. 11, 2001. The source said that one primary concern was the electrical grid, and what would happen if it were attacked from a broadband connection.

When Rockefeller, the chairman of the Senate Commerce committee, and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) introduced the original bill in April, they claimed it was vital to protect national cybersecurity. "We must protect our critical infrastructure at all costs--from our water to our electricity, to banking, traffic lights and electronic health records," Rockefeller said.

The Rockefeller proposal plays out against a broader concern in Washington, D.C., about the government's role in cybersecurity. In May, President Obama acknowledged that the government is "not as prepared" as it should be to respond to disruptions and announced that a new cybersecurity coordinator position would be created inside the White House staff. Three months later, that post remains empty, one top cybersecurity aide has quit, and some wags have begun to wonder why a government that receives failing marks on cybersecurity should be trusted to instruct the private sector what to do.

Rockefeller's revised legislation seeks to reshuffle the way the federal government addresses the topic. It requires a "cybersecurity workforce plan" from every federal agency, a "dashboard" pilot project, measurements of hiring effectiveness, and the implementation of a "comprehensive national cybersecurity strategy" in six months--even though its mandatory legal review will take a year to complete.

The privacy implications of sweeping changes implemented before the legal review is finished worry Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. "As soon as you're saying that the federal government is going to be exercising this kind of power over private networks, it's going to be a really big issue," he says.

Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to "direct the national response to the cyber threat" if necessary for "the national defense and security." The White House is supposed to engage in "periodic mapping" of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies "shall share" requested information with the federal government. ("Cyber" is defined as anything having to do with the Internet, telecommunications, computers, or computer networks.)

"The language has changed but it doesn't contain any real additional limits," EFF's Tien says. "It simply switches the more direct and obvious language they had originally to the more ambiguous (version)...The designation of what is a critical infrastructure system or network as far as I can tell has no specific process. There's no provision for any administrative process or review. That's where the problems seem to start. And then you have the amorphous powers that go along with it."

Translation: If your company is deemed "critical," a new set of regulations kick in involving who you can hire, what information you must disclose, and when the government would exercise control over your computers or network.

The Internet Security Alliance's Clinton adds that his group is "supportive of increased federal involvement to enhance cyber security, but we believe that the wrong approach, as embodied in this bill as introduced, will be counterproductive both from an national economic and national secuity perspective."

Update at 3:14 p.m. PDT: I just talked to Jena Longo, deputy communications director for the Senate Commerce committee, on the phone. She sent me e-mail with this statement:

The president of the United States has always had the constitutional authority, and duty, to protect the American people and direct the national response to any emergency that threatens the security and safety of the United States. The Rockefeller-Snowe Cybersecurity bill makes it clear that the president's authority includes securing our national cyber infrastructure from attack. The section of the bill that addresses this issue, applies specifically to the national response to a severe attack or natural disaster. This particular legislative language is based on longstanding statutory authorities for wartime use of communications networks. To be very clear, the Rockefeller-Snowe bill will not empower a "government shutdown or takeover of the Internet" and any suggestion otherwise is misleading and false. The purpose of this language is to clarify how the president directs the public-private response to a crisis, secure our economy and safeguard our financial networks, protect the American people, their privacy and civil liberties, and coordinate the government's response.

Unfortunately, I'm still waiting for an on-the-record answer to these four questions that I asked her colleague on Wednesday. I'll let you know if and when I get a response.


Be sure you check out the original article, it has many links and resources.
User IP Logged

Pest
W*P*P*C

member is offline

Avatar

If the enemy is in range, so are you...


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 190
xx Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #81 on: Sep 18th, 2009, 4:21pm »



Oooooh, that's a Benelli one hole aromatic combat shoot gun, nice.
« Last Edit: Jun 12th, 2014, 11:14am by Yardbird » User IP Logged

User Image
Pest
W*P*P*C

member is offline

Avatar

If the enemy is in range, so are you...


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 190
xx Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #82 on: Sep 18th, 2009, 4:33pm »



I used to go to combat pistol matches at in indoor range here in Houston. The owner told me that IRS agents frequently came in to practice, and that their general incompetence in pistolcraft was absolutely scary. Their arrogance and snottiness prevented any constructive criticism.
« Last Edit: Jun 12th, 2014, 11:14am by Yardbird » User IP Logged

User Image
Jackolope
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mayans off a year?

YIM YIM AIM
Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4129
exclamation Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #83 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 10:22pm »

Some things to note:

Study: Ben Bernanke & Paulson are big fat liars. No surprise there... not to us anyway.



FBI Edited Oklahoma Bombing video?



User IP Logged

Jackolope
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mayans off a year?

YIM YIM AIM
Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4129
exclamation Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #84 on: Oct 7th, 2009, 2:52pm »

UN to change USAs freedom of Speech. Approved by Obama
http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/017/043ytrhc.asp?pg=1

And we need a topic just for ACORN but I found this:
http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/10/acorn_embezzlement_was_5_milli.html



Also
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/61783-pelosi-says-new-tax-is-on-the-table
NEW VAT TAX! ,...

User IP Logged

Firewolf
nrly W*P*P*C

member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 36
exclamation Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #85 on: Oct 8th, 2009, 02:24am »

Wow Jack.
You and I must be like mental clones or something.

I was just reading a blog about the Pelosi VAT tax (my wife blogged on it too). Then I surfed over to the Weekly Standard. The only thing I missed was ACORN corruption, but I don't think I can take much more of them anywayz, and keep my dinner down...

Well, I did look at another link about corruption. Imagine that, in this day and age...
A link about Charlie Rangel and the George Orwell “Animal Farm” Congress is creating:
http://seatoshiningsea.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/democrats-fast-becoming-that-which-they-scorned/

--Good gaming tonight! btw.
User IP Logged

Jackolope
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mayans off a year?

YIM YIM AIM
Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4129
exclamation Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #86 on: Oct 9th, 2009, 10:52am »

Srsly,

Pelosi is off her rocker if she thinks this wont effect middle class. If a manufacturing company has to pay all these extra taxes then of course the consumer will be the one to pick up the tab. The cost will just get raised for goods sold. Seems simple to me. Perhaps Pelosi should take some marketing classes... Or just classes in general. shocked Some people... Sheesh
User IP Logged

Jackolope
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mayans off a year?

YIM YIM AIM
Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4129
exclamation Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #87 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 02:57am »

Woman Disabled by Flu Shot Reaction:

http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/health/101309_woman_disabled_by_flu_shot_reaction_dystonia

Quote:
WASHINGTON, D.C. - An Ashburn, Virginia woman is in the fight of her life after suffering a very rare side effect to the seasonal flu shot.

The vast majority of doctors say flu shots are safe. In this case, the FDA says they found nothing wrong with this particular batch, but sometimes there are complications.

That's apparently what happened to Desiree Jennings, and now her life will never be the same.

* FOR AN UPDATE ON DESIREE AND HER CONDITION, CLICK HERE FOR OUR NEWEST STORY.

At 26 years old, Desiree Jennings was the picture of health. She's a Washington Redskins cheerleader and an avid runner. Her life changed forever on August 23 when she says she got a seasonal flu shot at a local grocery store.

"I was training for a half marathon then," said Jennings, crying. "It just all went so fast."

Ten days after receiving the shot, she came down with the flu. After that, her health spiraled downwards. She started passing out and had to be hospitalized twice.

"We went to an urgent care place and they wouldn't even let her get out of my truck because she was seizing in the back so bad, so they called an ambulance immediately," says her husband, Brendan Jennings.

Doctors at Fairfax Inova and Johns Hopkins diagnosed her with a rare neurological disorder called dystonia. They think it was caused by a severe reaction to the flu shot.

Desiree now has difficulty speaking, walking, and even eating. During an interview with FOX 5, she had several seizures. The effects are irreversible.

"The symptoms will get worse if I use my voice or walk when the brain signals are misfiring," says Jennings.

Desiree reported her health problems to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) thinking there might have been something wrong with her vaccine. We also contacted the FDA and we were told they found no problems with the particular lot of flu vaccines that Desiree received, and the agency has not received any other reports of adverse effects from this lot.

Health experts stress that overall, extreme side effects are rare.

"The flu shot is safe for the majority of the public, and as I said before, your heart goes out to someone that experiences this sort of thing-- thinking that they are doing something great for their wellness and their general health, but it does happen in extremely rare cases," says Rachel Lynch with Fairfax Inove Health System.

For Desiree, she just happened to be one of those rare cases.

"I just don't want this to happen to anyone else," says Jennings.

Desiree and her husband plan to visit the Mayo Clinic in Arizona in November. They're hoping to get more answers about this disease and how they live with it.

Desiree has received flu shots before in 2007 and 2008.
User IP Logged

SpiffCat
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 2210
exclamation Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #88 on: Oct 23rd, 2009, 04:17am »



I never spoke to my daughter about much our WPPC conspiracy theories before, but now she is a freshman in high school and I'm helping her out with a science assignment. The assignment has to do with human population growth.

When I grew up, I always had the population of the world set at 4 billion in my mind. This is because it was true in 1976. By 1980, it was 4.4 billion. Today we are at 6.8 billion!

The graph she had to make is pretty startling. And she has to extrapolate future growth. Here is the data:

YearPopulation in Billions
16500.50
17500.70
18501.0
19252.0
19562.5
19663.3
19703.6
19743.9
19764.0
19804.4
19915.5
20006.0
20046.4
20096.8


So, based on this data, we can see that the population is currently increasing by 1 billion people every 10 years and is accelerating. Before the industrial revolution, the population growth was gradual and linear. Now it's exponential.

Experts disagree about what is the maximum capacity of the earth. They think it's somewhere between 8 to 10 billion.

We are going to hit 7 billion somewhere around 2010. If the trend continues, we will be at 8 billion around 2020.

Now what would you do, as a world leader, looking at a world that is maxing out it's population capacity? There is only so much food, energy, water, and other resources. Eventually, one would think that mass chaos, war, disease, famine, and riots would cause a good amount of the population to die off when we exceed our maximum capacity. But what world leader would want that?

China has had population control measures in place for some time now. The idea of the government limiting the number of children permitted per family seemed outrageous. But from a purely objective, management position, what other choice is there?

This new Science and Technology Czar may be coming up with cold and heartess ideas for limiting the population growth of the world... but consider the consequences of doing nothing.

The scary part is that we are fast approaching the planet's limit of 8 to 10 billion people. It always seemed so far off... something most of never imagined that we would have to deal with. But if we figure that those of us in our 40's will still be around in 20 years, we are looking at a planet population of 9 billion people! We are going to be in our 60's while our kids are in their 20's.

So what do we do? Do nothing and head toward an unsustainable population and it's consequences? Or do we implement draconian measures to slow or reverse the growth?

This czar figured out this problem back in the early 70's. His solution of putting stuff into the water seems pretty impractical because of dosing problems and the effect it would have on animals, etc.

Now engage the conspiracy theories: How else are you going to stop people from reproducing? How about releasing a new flu virus that targets young people. Then provide a vaccine and recommend that it is given to young children and pregnant women. You wouldn't have to worry about old folks... they can't reproduce anymore and will die off in a few years anyway. By using this vaccine tactic, you can control the dosage of a sterilization agent and deliver it to the part of the population most capable of reproduction.

Not long ago, they implemented a vaccine (Gardasil) designed to fight a virus that leads to cervical cancer. Who is strongly urged to take this vaccine? Girls age 11 to 12. They also promote a catch-up program for those from age 13 to 26. The vaccine requires 3 doses given over several months.

Now it could be just a coincidence, but it seems that these vaccines are targeting the young, soon-to-be child-bearing population.

The H1N1 seems to be hitting the young the hardest, which is a twist from the usual flu. So this flu can cull the younger population who are not vaccinated while the rest of the younger population takes the sterilization vaccine.

Once again, these are just conspiracy theories. Unfortunately, this conspiracy theory puts us between a rock and hard place. Either our governments are sterilizing us without telling us... or they are doing nothing and letting us slide into a catastrophic and unsustainable population level.

-- FeelLikeI'mStuckInABadTwilightZoneEpisodeCat
« Last Edit: Jun 12th, 2014, 11:16am by Yardbird » User IP Logged

User Image
Jackolope
site admin
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mayans off a year?

YIM YIM AIM
Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4129
exclamation Re: Wake up Y'all!!!
« Reply #89 on: Nov 10th, 2009, 11:01am »

One huge video deserves another:


So far we have watched a machine that makes electric waves that may control peoples behavior and the weather (HAARP) Peak oil and how to cook children (kidding, consumer kids) I now give you this - A movie about our current president and how he seems to be working for the same group that Bush worked for. *Warning* This is an Alex Jones movie, with that I have watched most of this and deemed it has enough factual information that is real (about the lobbyists in his cabinet and who they really work for and why) The rest may be bat shi# crazy. But maybe not.. Decide for your self. *Interesting note* 2 months ago any website that hosted this video disappeared. Not been happening in a while and I think it is ok to post it.


Yard? Get your popcorn.





If you would like to save these videos then click HERE and just copy the url of the youtube videos. You can save the videos then.


And Camp Fema Right click this link and hit "save target as"


Thoughts?
« Last Edit: Nov 10th, 2009, 11:04am by Jackolope » User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8  Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls